ISO/IEC DIS 27004   Stage 40.60, close of voting Planning date, an estimate 14 Sep 2027 The recordFree checkKit USD 799 and watch USD 49 a month
8.3Header
Clause 8. The measurement processes

Create and maintain measures

Header clause in the published 2016 guidanceRecord 17 of 67Updated 2026-10-21

This heading introduces five steps for building and maintaining the measure set.

What the published 2016 guidance says

This heading introduces five steps for building and maintaining the measure set. The triggers for review matter as much as the first design. A measure is created once, then revisited at planned intervals or when the environment changes materially: scope, structure, interested parties, objectives, law, a run of stable results, or a new or retired technology. The review should cost less than the first build, which is possible only if the construct was documented well enough to be understood later.

What it means in practice

This is the maintenance heart of the programme. Measures are created once, then reviewed at planned intervals and on substantial change: scope, structure, interested parties, objectives, law, stable results, or new technology. The review should cost less than the first build, which is only true if the construct was documented properly.

Status of this record. For 8.3, this page states the published 2016 guidance, not the DIS text. The DIS is at stage 40.60 and is not public. Check the published edition before you rely on the row.

What good looks like

Give the measure set a version, an owner and a review date. Record the trigger for the last review and the changes made. Keep the retired measures with the reason, so the history is not lost.

Evidence an assessor asks for

  • Performance evaluationThe measure register with a version, an owner and a review date
  • Performance evaluationThe trigger list used at the last review

The question an assessor will ask

An assessor will ask for the measure register with a version, an owner and a review date. The test for 8.3 is whether that record can be produced for a live sample, not whether the guidance is described in a procedure.

Common gaps

  • Measures are created and never reviewed
  • The review trigger list is missing, so a scope or tool change passes unnoticed
  • The review costs as much as the first build because the construct was never documented

Before the next review

Before the next review, test this against one live record: measures are created and never reviewed.

What to check when the revision publishes

When DIS 27004 is published, compare the 8.3 Create and maintain measures record with this page. Ask whether the information need, the formula, the target, the frequency or the owner changes. Update the measure register and the kit, not the requirement, because the clause 9.1 duty stays as it is.